SKANDAL!

SKANDAL!

Nödfall!

SOME OF THE WORST CASES OF RACIAL PREJUDICE IN WORLD HISTORY!

PLEASE MAKE SURE KING CARL XVI GUSTAF GETS THE INFORMATION BELOW!

(There are thousands of copies of the information below on the Internet in Sweden.)

The American people are thrilled to have their first African-American president.

Speaking of Barack Obama—Barack Obama is a racial-minority individual and does not like racism:

And Michelle Obama is a racial-minority individual and does not like racism:

WORLDWIDE DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO SCANDALS:

(I) I do solemnly swear by Almighty God that George W. Bush committed atrocious, racist, hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism which I am not at liberty to mention. Many people know what Bush did. And many people will know what Bush did—even until the end of the world. Bush was absolute evil. Bush is now like a fugitive from justice. In any case, Bush will go down in history in infamy.

(II) It is opined that Bill Clinton committed terrifying, racist, hate crimes during his presidency, and I am not free to say anything further about it. ‘Be sure your sins will find you out’ (Numbers 32:23).

(III) What if basically all racial-minority people would subscribe to the interpretations that George Herbert Walker Bush committed monstrous, racist, hate crimes while he was the President of the United States? It will eventually come out: it is only a matter of time.

(IV) I know it may be hard to believe. However, Ronald Wilson Reagan committed horrible, racist, hate crimes during his presidency.

Respectfully Submitted by Andrew Yu-Jen Wang, J.D. Candidate
B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
Messiah College, Grantham, PA
Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993

(There are thousands of copies on the Internet indicating the contents of (I), (II), (III), and (IV). For example, one can go to Google right now, type “George W. Bush committed hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism,” hit “Enter,” and readily find 1,000 or more copies indicating content of (I). For example, one can go to Msn right now (14 April 2009), type “It is opined that Bill Clinton committed racist hate crimes, and I am not free to say anything further about it,” hit “Enter,” and readily find more than 460 copies indicating content of (II). For example, one can go to Msn right now, type “George Herbert Walker Bush committed monstrous, racist, hate crimes,” hit “Enter,” and readily find more than 210 copies indicating content of (III). For example, one can go to Msn right now, type “Ronald Wilson Reagan committed horrible, racist, hate crimes during his presidency,” hit “Enter,” and readily find more than 180 copies indicating content of (IV). The contents of (I), (II), (III), and (IV) exist very extensively in all major search engines. And there are thousands of copies in very many countries around the world. For example, there are countless copies on the Internet in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Denmark, France, Germany, India, Japan, Korea, Russia, Sweden, the United Kingdom, etc.)

“BAD NEWS FROM THE UNITED STATES: ON THE RACIST HATE CRIMES AND ETERNAL INFAMIES OF GEORGE W. BUSH, BILL CLINTON, GEORGE H.W. BUSH, AND RONALD REAGAN” BLOG OF ANDREW YU-JEN WANG
________________
‘If only there could be a BAN against invention that bottled up memories like scent & they never faded & they never got stale.’ Off the top of my head, it came from my Lower Merion High School yearbook.

Varför det ? Jo för att inte ministrarna ska behöva bosätta sej i Bryssel fungerar ministerrådet i flera steg:

1. Arbetsgrupper med representanter för alla regeringar diskterar frågorna och skjuter det de inte kommer överens om uppåt till:

2. COREPER, ambassadörernas ständiga kommitté, som diskuterar det som blev över och skjuter de få frågor de inte kan enas om uppåt till:

3. ministrarna. Det som länderna enats om redan på lägre nivåer klubbas igenom utan debatt; vilken minister som helst kan delta eftersom frågorna inte behöver diskuteras.

Som du ser av protokollet du länkar till står beslutet inte under ‘Items debated’ utan under ‘Other items approved’.

Så var exempelvis fallet med EU:s fiskeavtal med Marocko. Men som sagt, jag vet inte alls hur man bör tolka ministerrådets svar. Därav mina frågor.

Ministerrådet pekar på i sitt svar att parlamentet ska få ”delta i slutandet av avtalet i enlighet med relevanta bestämmelser i fördraget, såsom är fallet med alla internationella avtal” men vad är det som säger att det blir ett deltagande genom ett samtyckesförfarande?

Det återstår att se hur ministerrådet tolkar frågan om Actaavtalet till slut.

Jag undrade mest vad det var i deras svar till dig som fick dig att tro att de kommer att låta parlamentet delta i beslutsprocessen genom sk \

Hogern har jobbat mot Bodstroms overvakningssamhalle i manga ar och helt plotsligt byter de sida med varandra. Vad hande?

Inte är det enkela frågor inte, och jag kanske var oklar i min fråga men innebär löftet från ministerrådet givet att man planerar att använda sig av samtyckesförfarandet (\\